How to evaluate confidence of migration events?

I merged the South America dataset with mine (South Brazil).
The problem is that I have hundreads of sequences for South Brazil, so some “mugration” events do not make sense, ie some lineages appear to have arisen in South Brazil (but I am not sure that this is true, I believe it is a problem of undersampling for the rest of Brazil).

I also performed an independent phylogenetic reconstruction using only samples of certain pango lineages. Bootstrap values are very low, as expected, considering the narrow timeframe and the slow-evolving virus.

However, it makes me consider how much I can rely on the ancestral reconstruction of the nextstrain tree. How do I know if the viral migration events are in fact representing the reality?

The migration analysis reports marginal probabilities for ancestral locations. But these probabilities assume similar sampling efforts across the tree. In absence of a carefully sampled data set, wouldn’t put much confidence in these reconstructions.

Thank you very much.